Pierce, Post 3

Within the reading “The Work of Art of Its Reproducibility” there are many abstract themes. I found in the reading as a whole the theme of an ora weaves a thread throughout the article. And it can be seen from certain angles that ora has died due to technology. Pictures have a certain ora about them, an originality about its essence. But, has it really died? Maybe it is a zombie. Not dead or alive. Within the second part of the reading, there was also a lot of reference towards comparisons. The magician and surgeon simile was beautiful. He related those two professions to the camera machine and paint. I also loved when he brought up film. I quote that resonated with me was when he stated; “To photograph a painting is one kind of reproduction, but to photograph an action performed in a film studio is another. In the first case, what is reproduced is a work of art, while the act of producing it is not.” This is where he brought up the term montage and coined it as a way to create an art form out of film. I agree with this statement because movies and films as a whole are an art form. But, when one takes a snapshot of a scene, there is typically not art there within that one image. In all, this article was complex and very interesting.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Response to "The Work of Art in the Age of it's Technological Reproducibility" -Anna Garrett

While I was reading this article, I best understood it as comparing it to branding. Meanwhile I believe the authenticity of art is important and builds an "aura" that is meaningful, I often times become frustrated with the ability of brands to brand in a way that makes the same material way more expensive because of the associated name. For example, the way a piece of nylon can become 5x as expensive because it has the lulu lemon logo on it. Art however I think deserves the "aura" or as we would say now "clout" it receives. There is something about being able to see something that has been frozen throughout time, and yet still encapsulates the full quintessence of what the artist wished to portray while also speaking to individuals in a unique way.
Read more

Pierce, Post2

Within the reading "The Work of Art in the Ages of its Technological Republicibility" there is a lot of talk about originals and copies. This concept is really fascinating because it seems like originals are very few and far between nowadays. There are copies of everything and multiple ways to access things. Mass production is still happening even though the idea of uniqueness and originality is what people strive for within most contexts. "Authenticity" has a beautiful ring to it. And this word pops up a lot within the author's tone.  A quote that I found to resonate with the article is "in photography it can bring out aspects of the original that are accessible only to the lens". As a beginning photographer, there is a beauty to this statement because it gives the images we capture an intimate characteristic.
Read more

2nd Benjamin Reading - Brad Sigety

2nd Reading The second reading by Benjamin was complicated and hard to read. I did not really enjoy struggling through the hard/complex language that forced me to stop reading and go back through to get a better understanding. The ending was the most annoying part for me as he got extremely political. I am a self called history buff (I love reading and learning about history) and love learning about the world wars. However even this was a little extreme for me. I understand his believe that fascism is not a healthy government for lots of countries around it as it has a need to expand to other areas. Benjamin then goes off and says how the global communist revolution is the answer. It was a little interesting in how he connected art to history, The most interesting is how he was able to draw a clear line from photography to ancient spiritual artwork. However, if Benjamin would have only exclude getting his political view involved I feel I would have enjoyed it more. Overall I found thi...
Read more